SUBJECT: Lab grades in multi-section course
DATE: 5/97
 
 
Hello all.
 
At the end of last semester I found myself in a discussion about the
number (overall percentage) of A's that are being given in my Introductory
Biolgoy Laboratory Course. I would like to ask several questions of those
of you who supervise or coordinate Introductory Biology Labs with many
(20+ ??) sections. This past fall we ran 45 sections of the first
course in the sequence and this spring we ran 39 sections of the second
course. I supervise a staff of 14-18 graduate students TAs, part-time
faculty, and full-time faculty (depending on the semester). Our lab
course is a separate, free-standing one credit course; its grade does
not contribute to the student's lecture grade.
 
For those of you in similar situations:
 
1. How do you evaluate your students? We currently use a combination of
lab assignments, a formal lab report, brief lab quizzes (2), weekly
pre-lab protocols and participation ("gimmee points" if the students
attend lab), and a final practical examination worth 25% of the final
grade.
 
We use standard answer keys and point distributions so I feel that we
already do as good a job as possible in the "consistency" department.
 
Our students complain vocally and vociferously because their practical
exam scores lower their final grades, but my feeling is that the
practical is the only time they do work that I know is "their own".
 
2. How do you determine final grades? We adjust the individual
Instructor's means to a standard mean and then use a standard scale
for everyone.
 
3. Do you aim for a standard percent of each letter grade each year? I
see two problems with this: 1) what if the students from one year to
the next are not of the same ability or do not achieve the same
success?, and 2) aren't we then guilty of giving unearned grades -
which we all complain about occurring in high schools? As has been
discussed previously on this list, our students' ability and/or
willingness to work hard, has decreased dramtically over my six years
here at Pitt.
 
4. Does your Department or University have any prescribed standards for
assigning grades?
 
I don't want my lab course to be a "weeding out" course
- but if the students are unwilling or unable to do the required work I
don't want to reward them with a meaningless grade. The other problem I
see is that most lab grades are not a "curve" but a "plateau";
consequently if you increase the number of A's you lose the D's and/or
F's. This is not a problem for me - but it may end up being a problem for
my chair.
 
I apologize if this note is long, but this has really been bothering me
for a while now.
 
Does anyone out there have any comments or ideas? I would appreciate
any/all answers. Thanks.
 
Rosemary
 
**********************************************************
Rosemary E. Boone Department of Biological Sciences
rmboone+@pitt.edu University of Pittsburgh
(412) 624-9325 G2 Clapp Hall
Fax: (412) 624-4759 Pittsburgh, PA 15260
 
 
My course is much like the one Rosemary describes in size, staffing, and
evalution points. Our tests are given by a "teaching team" of 4 TAs who
make up the test together and they also switch lab reports for grading
among other TAs. Since each TA makes up tests with two different groups
(usually), tests are approved by a supervising staff member, and all of
this is done by a point distribution rubric, we assume that all 1000
students can be graded as a single pool. If any group or TA seems to be
an outlier, we check their lab against their lecture grade (generally a TA
asserts that they have a lot of A students in their class and we can tell
if that is likely to be true by checking lecture grade).
 
We then do a
scale for the course as a whole, give about 50% As and Bs, 40% Cs, a few
Ds and very few Fs. This is MUCH MORE generous than lecture grades and we
justify it to ourselves by saying tha the students do SO MUCH work for
their one hour credit that they deserve a break.
 
The students complain A LOT, especially about having their lab reports
graded by a TA other than their own. This plan is definitely imperfect,
but I think that our checks and balances make the grades extremely fair.
 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Jean DeSaix, Ph.D.
Department of Biology Coker Hall CB#3280
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3280
Work Phone: 919-962-1068 Home Phone 919-929-1580
FAX 919-962-1625 email jdesaix@email.unc.edu
 
 
In the intro courses I teach, we give several practicals, each longer
than the previous one and more comprehensive. This gives students plenty
of warning that the practical will not be easy. It also helps them figure
out how to study for it. To solve the time problem in setting it up, we
have the students set up practice practicals that don't count and the
GTA's comment on the questions and how these compare to the real thing.
UTA's usually help in those setups, and convey the importance to the
students. I have had a minimum of complaints. I also offer a carrot - if
a student earns at least 80% on the final practical and is satisfied with
the grade, that student need not take the lecture final.
Janice
***********************************
Janice M. Glime, Professor
Department of Biological Sciences
Michigan Technological University
Houghton, MI 49931-1295
jmglime@mtu.edu
906-487-2546
FAX 906-487-3167
***********************************
 
 
Rosemary-
I struggle with this each semester myself. I'll respond to your questions
then add any remarks that may be of assistance.
 
>1. How do you evaluate your students?
 
We use a variety of assessment tools including: 6 TA written quizzes (drop
lowest score - 50 points), 2 Homework Assignments (a histogram and a
genetics worksheet - 60 points total), 2 practicals (50 points each), a
formal scientific report - 30pts, a poster project that may go to a faculty
judged session -45 points (this is a group project), and maintainance of a
lab journal - 30pts. All assignments other than the quizzes are written by
me but graded by the TAs.
 
We are also a stand alone 1 credit course. I am constantly baraged with
"too much work for one credit" complaints but I feel the lab is where we
can bring it all together and do "real" biology.
>
>2. How do you determine final grades? We adjust the individual
> Instructor's means to a standard mean and then use a standard scale
> for everyone.
 
We do the same thing.
>
>3. Do you aim for a standard percent of each letter grade each year? I
> see two problems with this:
 
No, some semesters we give out so many As and Bs I wince and other
semesters its just the opposite. About three semesters ago we had a really
rough semester and ended up with about 4% As. I like it when we hover
around 10% but don't force it.
 
>
>4. Does your Department or University have any prescribed standards for
> assigning grades?
>
No.
 
The other problem I
>see is that most lab grades are not a "curve" but a "plateau";
>consequently if you increase the number of A's you lose the D's and/or
>F's. This is not a problem for me - but it may end up being a problem for
>my chair.
>
We see the plateau effect here too. They seem to cluster at 77-80% but
very few can muster the 92 it takes to get a true A.
 
>I apologize if this note is long, but this has really been bothering me
>for a while now.
 
This entire grading practice really unnerves me. I truly think it gets in
the way of learning. I see so many that just work for the grade and never
really learn. I try to write assessments that force integration and
synthesis but some can always fool the system. The other confounding
principle is how can we really look at a "curve" when we allow students to
drop the course halfway through. Typically all the Ds and Fs drop leaving
the rest that is supposed to be "normalized" in some manner. I like to
think we grade on a criterion basis but that end of the semester
equalization among 48 sections really confounds the issue.
 
Not much help but at least I empathize.
 
Chris
V. Christine Minor
Biology Laboratory Coordinator
Iowa State University
154 Bessey Hall
Ames, IA 50011
515-294-8596 vcmahaff@iastate.edu
http://www.biology.iastate.edu/
 
 
I've copied this to biolab because it bears on the present discussion
about how we count labs.
Rosemary Boone asked:
>
> Janice-
>
> I have two questions: 1) How much lab time do you spend on the various
> practicals?
That varies. Maybe 20 minutes on the ones the students set up for
practice - they are early in the term with little material. In some
courses, We may use 20-30 minutes of lab time for a graded practical
during the term, but the final practical takes one hour and is done in the
evening outside of class time. I also give my lecture tests at night so
students have ample time. We are "expected" to give the students an hour
off lecture if we give an evening exam, but instead I use the last week to
review, using the argument that they can get off work for a test but not
for a review and that if necessary I can give a written test at a
different time, so everyone has equal access to the review this way.
Botany: 1 ungraded practical during lab
2 graded practicals during lab
1 graded final practical outside of lab
Organismal Biology:
1 graded practical during lab (about 20 min)
1 graded practical outside of lab (1 hour)
Plant Morphology
2 graded practicals during lab (half hr, 1 hr)
Plant Taxonomy
graded practicals during class daily (meets daily for 2 weeks)
time increases from 15 min 2n day to 3-4 hrs for final (spread
over 2 days)
and 2) Do these practicals count toward their final grade?
In Botany and plant morphology, labs are so closely tied to lectures that
I offer the option of 95% earns an automatic A in the course no matter
what other grades are; 80% or above and student need not take final
lecture exam - grade will be average of lab and lecture.
In all cases, lab counts about half the grade. Practicals make up most of
the lab grade.
Janice
***********************************
Janice M. Glime, Professor
Department of Biological Sciences
Michigan Technological University
Houghton, MI 49931-1295
jmglime@mtu.edu
906-487-2546
FAX 906-487-3167
***********************************
 
 
This is an interesting thread. I particularly agree with the comments
concerning the discrepancy between unit credit for lecture and lab. Some
students may not be very motivated to do their best for a one unit lab grade.
 
I have a problem with the comparison of lecture and laboratory grades.
Although I realize that this is frequently done, I'm not certain how sound a
practice this is. Some students may perform differently in lab than in
lecture because of the type of learner that they are. Is it a given that the
grade curve for lecture and lab are the same? Is there any educational
research to back this up or is this just a matter of convenience so that the
grades are consistent?
 
Tom Smith
Van Nuys, CA
<TMSMITH2@aol.com>
 
 
TMSMITH2@aol.com wrote:
>This is an interesting thread. I particularly agree with the comments
>concerning the discrepancy between unit credit for lecture and lab. Some
>students may not be very motivated to do their best for a one unit lab grade.
 
Yes, it is interesting. At my present location and the previous one,
lecture and lab are a combined 4-credit course, and we give the lab portion
25% of the total grade.
 
>I have a problem with the comparison of lecture and laboratory grades.
> Although I realize that this is frequently done, I'm not certain how sound a
>practice this is. Some students may perform differently in lab than in
>lecture because of the type of learner that they are.
 
In a way this may be good in our course, because it somewhat levels the
playing field.
 
Lane
----
Lane Lester / <mailto:llester@athens.net> / Athens, Georgia USA
 
 
>
>>I have a problem with the comparison of lecture and laboratory grades.
>> Although I realize that this is frequently done, I'm not certain how sound a
>>practice this is. Some students may perform differently in lab than in
>>lecture because of the type of learner that they are.
>
While a few individual students may perform differently in lab than in
lecture, there is an overall correlation between lab and lecture scores.
(Try plotting lab against lecture, and see how few outliers occur.) If
grades are recorded in a master spreadsheet throughout the semester,
differences among instructors can be monitored by comparing the average
lab-lecture score. This could provide good material for a TA meeting that
would help grad students become more expert and reflective. "How do the
questions on these two tests differ?" "What were you looking for when you
graded this question?" Lab grades will still probably require adjustment at
the end of the semester, but the TAs will have learned something.
 
lyndah@csufresno.edu
Ethelynda Harding, Director
Center for Enhancement of Teaching and Learning
5240 N. Jackson Avenue M/S 116
Fresno CA 93740-8023
(209) 278-2819
fax (209) 278-3963
 
 
On Thu, 22 May 1997 TMSMITH2@aol.com wrote:
 
> I have a problem with the comparison of lecture and laboratory grades.
> Although I realize that this is frequently done, I'm not certain how sound a
> practice this is. Some students may perform differently in lab than in
> lecture because of the type of learner that they are. Is it a given that the
> grade curve for lecture and lab are the same? Is there any educational
> research to back this up or is this just a matter of convenience so that the
> grades are consistent?
>
> Tom Smith
> Van Nuys, CA
> <TMSMITH2@aol.com>
>
Good questions!
 
I wonder if any of you have tried to standardize laboratory instructors'
grading by using a common final exam on lab material. Anyone know how to
do this? I have tried it on several occasions, but not with very happy
results. I think a big barrier is lack of good exams that measure
comprehension of science process, but learning styles and other factors
may be important too.
 
RK
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Robert B. Ketcham Biology (302) 831-2377
Laboratory Coordinator Univ of Delaware rketcham@Udel.Edu
Newark, DE 19716-2590
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 

Biolab Home Page